Q?
For those of us that aren't aware, some scholars believe that Matthew and Luke copied a lot of their material from the gospel of Mark (supposedly the oldest Gospel). But there is a lot in Matthew and Luke that doesn't appear in Mark. So, some scholars came up with a hypothetical document titled 'quelle' (a German word meaning 'source'). 'Q', for short. Now, it should be noted that no one has ever seen this document and church history doesn't seem to know about it. But, most...ahem...'liberal' scholarship holds to it like it is the source document for (at least) the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke). However, my view is more like this (And mind you, this is just my view. I haven't heard this from anyone else.). To me, Mark reads more like an underground subversive tract. Almost like a secret code -- the kind you swallow or burn up after you've read it. What I see as a more likely possibility is that Mark copied from...